|
MASSACHUSETTS
I. Definition of Gambling
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 7 makes it illegal for an individual to
set up or promote a lottery. As true with most other jurisdictions, the
three elements of a lottery include prize, consideration, and chance. Commonwealth
v. Plissner, 4 N.E. 2d 214, 244 (Mass. 1936). As always, the burning
question is how much chance must be present in a game before it is considered
a lottery.
Massachusetts uses the “predominant test” in evaluating if
a particular game or scheme is a lottery. This means that even though both
chance and skill may be present in a game, if chance is the dominant element
then it is considered a lottery. Commonwealth v. Lake, 57 N.E.2d
923, 925 (Mass. 1944). Explained in another way, if the element of chance
overrides the exercise of skill and judgment in a game, then the game is
a lottery. Commonwealth v. Plissner, 4 N.E.2d 241, 245 (Mass. 1936).
Massachusetts courts have said that in determining what factor is predominant
in a game, it may be necessary to look beyond the game itself and look at
the people that actually play it. Lake, 57 N.E.2d at 925. In the
Lake case, the court said that although some people may be able to
gain a significant amount of skill at the “crane game” in question,
the majority of people that play the game play it so infrequently that it
would definitely be considered a game of chance. Id. Therefore, the
court held that this was a lottery. Id.
Free Entry
Whether or not free entry takes a game or scheme out of the lottery definition
in Massachusetts is a fact-based question. The promotional game in Mobil
Oil Corp. v. Attorney Gen., 280 N.E.2d 406, 411 (Mass. 1972), involved
a gas station giving out game pieces that could lead to winning a prize
if the consumer collected the right combination of these pieces. No purchase
or payment was required to get these game pieces. Id. Although the
Attorney General argued that this scheme was very similar to the bank nights
found illegal in Massachusetts, the court disagreed. Id. at 412.
The court said in those bank nights purchasing an admission ticket gave
one an advantage over another individual that didn’t. Id.
Those in the theatre could easily hear if their name was called as the winner
and would not have to fight the mass crowd outside to collect their prize.
Id. The court said in this scheme that because one’s presence
was not required at a certain place to collect the prize and the prizes
were redeemable over a number of weeks, that those who purchased products
from the gas station gained no discernable advantage over those who got
their game pieces free. Id.
As mentioned above, bank night schemes have been held to be illegal lotteries
in Massachusetts. In Commonwealth v. Wall, 3 N.E.2d 28 (Mass. 1936),
the court held that a bank night scheme--where one could enter without buying
a ticket for admission--was illegal. The court said that the consideration
element required for a lottery meant giving something of value. Id. at
29-30. But the court stated that just because some people are allowed to
enter a contest without giving up something of value does not remove a scheme
from a lottery classification if others have to pay for their chance to
win. Id. at 30. The court said that the increased attendance inside
the theatre on the nights when this promotion was run was due to people
thinking that they would gain an advantage in winning the prize if they
bought a ticket. Id. The court was convinced that this made this
game a lottery. Id.
II. Definition of Bookmaking
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 17 makes it illegal for a person to keep
a place where they have “apparatus, books or any device, used for
registering bets, or buying or selling pools, upon the result of a trial
or contest of skill, speed or endurance of man, beast, bird or machine,
or upon the result of a game, competition, political nomination, appointment
or election . . . .”
The Massachusetts courts have went so far as to hold that one can “register”
a bet by committing it to memory. Commonwealth v. Cosolito, 269 N.E.2d
679, 681 (Mass. 1971). Massachusetts courts also interpret this definition
of apparatus very broadly. These courts have held that an ordinary article
can become an apparatus when used in connection with gambling activity.
Id. at 681 (holding that a racing publication was an apparatus because
it was used in placing bets).
III. Specific gaming device definitions
A gambling device in Massachusetts is defined as a slot machine or any
“machine or mechanical device an essential part of which is a drum
or reel with insignia thereon, and which, when operated, may deal, as a
result of the element of chance, any money or property . . . .” Mass.
Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 5A . However, there is an exception for antique
slot machines that are over thirty years old and that are not used for gambling
purposes. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 5A . Massachusetts is strict with
this reel or drum requirement as a slot machine-like device without these
components was held not to be a gambling device. Commonwealth v. Frate,
537 N.E.2d 1235, 1236 (Mass. 1989). Massachusetts has also taken liberal
view of the definition “property” as meant by this statute.
Free games awarded by a slot machine were held to be sufficient property.
Commonwealth v. Rivers, 82 N.E.2d 216, 219 (Mass. 1948).
IV. Bucket Shop Laws
A bucketing or bucket shopping in Massachusetts is defined as:
a) The making of, or offering to make, any contract respecting the purchase
or sale, either upon credit or upon margin, of any securities or commodities,
wherein both parties thereto intend, or such keeper intends, that such
contract shall be, or may be, terminated, closed or settled according
to, or upon the basis of, the public market quotations of prices made
on any board of trade or exchange upon which said securities or commodities
are dealt in, and without a bona fide purchase or sale of the same; or
(b) The making of, or offering to make, any contract respecting the purchase
or sale, either upon credit or upon margin, of any securities or commodities,
wherein both parties intend, or such keeper intends, that such contract
shall be, or may be, deemed terminated, closed or settled, when such public
market quotations of prices for the securities or commodities named in
such contract shall reach a certain figure without a bona fide purchase
or sale of the same; or
(c) The making of, or offering to make, any contract respecting the purchase
or sale, either upon credit or upon margin, of any securities or commodities,
wherein both parties do not intend, or such keeper does not intend, the
actual or bona fide receipt or delivery of such securities or commodities,
but do intend, or such keeper does intend, a settlement of such contract
based upon the differences in such public market quotations of prices
at which said securities or commodities are, or are asserted to be, bought
and sold.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 35.
V. Express Prohibitions on games of skill
1. Poker/Card games
While the game of Poker has been recognized by Massachusetts courts as
having elements of skill, it still seems that these courts regard chance
as the predominant element. See Commonwealth v. Club Caravan, Inc.,
571 N.E.2d 405, 406 (Mass. App. Ct. 1991).
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 2 specifically bans those in a public conveyance
or public place, or in a private place upon which he is trespassing, to
play or bet on a card game. In Commonwealth v. Douglas, 503 N.E.2d
28, 29 (Mass. 1987), two individuals were criminally charged with playing
poker for money. Furthermore, Poker was described as an unlawful game in
Commonwealth v. Novak, 172 N.E. 84, 84-5 (Mass. 1930). See also
Garvey v. McNulty, 170 N.E. 58, 59 (Mass. 1930).
Also, the court in Chapin v. Haley, 133 Mass. 127, 131 (1882), held
that an jury instruction which stated that if the jury “found the
game of draw poker, as described by witnesses, to be a game of chance on
which money was hazarded upon the kind of cards held by the respective players,
or by betting upon the hands so held, and if chips redeemable in money were
used by the players in place of money, then it was gaming prohibited by
the laws of this Commonwealth . . . .” was not erroneous. The jury
did in fact conclude that this was an illegal game of chance prohibited
by Massachusetts law. Id. at 129.
Additionally, the case of Commonwealth v. Wolbarst, 65 N.E.2d 552,
554 (Mass. 1946), described an older Massachusetts statute that punished
those that played at cards for money.
2. Dice
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 7 specifically prohibit lotteries that
dispose of property by using dice. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 2 bans
people from playing dice in a public place or at a private place where they
are trespassing.
Additionally, the case of Commonwealth v. Wolbarst, 65 N.E.2d 552,
554 (Mass. 1946), described an older statute that punished those that played
dice for money. See also Goldberg v. Feiga, 48 N.E. 1073 (Mass. 1898)
(holding that gaming includes a dice game).
In the case of Commonwealth v. Coleman, 68 N.E. 220, 221 (Mass.
1903), the court punished an individual that knew that the game of dice
was being played in his premises. The statute this individual was punished
under specifically punishes those that allow dice or other games of chance
to be conducted (emphasis added). Id. This language seems to indicate
that dice is grouped under the broad heading of games of chance.
3. Billiards
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 4 states that:
Whoever, in any place mentioned in the preceding section, for the purpose
of gaming for money or other property, uses or takes part in using a billiard
table, bowling alley or other implement of gaming, or there plays at an
unlawful game or sport, or, for the purpose of such gaming, uses or takes
part in using a billiard table or bowling alley kept by a person licensed
under chapter one hundred and forty, shall forfeit not more than fifty dollars.This
passage seems to indicate that gaming for money by using a billiard table
is a punishable offense.
In Murphy v. Rogers, 24 N.E. 35, 35-6 (Mass. 1890), the court held
that playing billiards, where the loser was to pay for certain agreed upon
things for the winner, amounts to gaming.
4. Bowling
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 4 states that:
Whoever, in any place mentioned in the preceding section, for the purpose
of gaming for money or other property, uses or takes part in using a billiard
table, bowling alley or other implement of gaming, or there plays at an
unlawful game or sport, or, for the purpose of such gaming, uses or takes
part in using a billiard table or bowling alley kept by a person licensed
under chapter one hundred and forty, shall forfeit not more than fifty dollars.
This passage seems to indicate that using a bowling alley to engage in
gaming for money or other property is a punishable offense.
The case of Commonwealth v. Dean, 1 Pick. 387 (Mass. 1823), held
that the playing of ninepins (an older version of bowling), constituted
gaming. See also Commonwealth v. Drew, 57 Mass. 279 (1849).
5. Darts
In Commonwealth v. Theatre Adv. Co., 190 N.E. 518 (Mass. 1934),
the court dealt with the game of beano, which in this instance involved
the use of darts. While the court alluded to the fact that skill was present
in this game because of the throwing of the darts, the element of chance
in this game thwarted that skill component, making this a game of chance.
Id. at 520.
VI. Express Exemptions
1. Social gambling
According to Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38 , an organization that is
composed of individuals sixty years or older, may operate or conduct beano
games without a license between the times of 9:00 am and 10:00 pm. However,
these organizations cannot charge more than five dollars to pay, and the
prizes awarded are limited to one hundred dollars. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10,
§ 38 .
Also, a town or city may grant a license to keep and operate an automatic
amusement device for hire, gain or reward. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 140, §
177A . This device is defined in Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 140, § 177A as:
any mechanism whereby, upon the deposit therein of a coin or
token, any apparatus is released or set in motion or put in a position where
it may be set in motion for the purpose of playing any game involving, in
whole or in part, the skill of the player, including, but not exclusively,
such devices as are commonly known as pinball machines including free play
pinball machines.
These machines must be kept for amusement only. See Commonwealth v.
Macomber, 130 N.E.2d 545, 546 (Mass. 1930). However, these machines
are still allowed to award the player a free play or game. Id. However,
if any other prize is offered as a result of playing the game, then this
machine cannot be legally licensed as it conflicts with the lottery prohibition
in the state of Massachusetts. Id.
The court in Commonwealth v. Club Caravan, Inc., 571 N.E.2d 405,
406-07 (Mass. App. Ct. 1991), held that video poker machines involved an
element of skill and thus could qualify as automatic amusement devices.
2. Charity gambling
Certain organizations are allowed to conduct a raffle or bazaar in the
state of Massachusetts. These organizations are:
(a) a veterans' organization chartered by the Congress of the
United States or included in clause (12) of section five of chapter forty
of the General Laws; (b) a church or religious organization; (c) a fraternal
or fraternal benefit society; (d) an educational or charitable organization;
(e) a civic or service club or organization; and (f) clubs or organizations
organized and operated exclusively for pleasure, recreation and other
nonprofit purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the
benefit of any member or shareholder.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 7A .
These organizations must apply for a permit from the clerk of the city
or town in which the raffle will be drawn or the bazaar held. Mass. Ann.
Laws ch. 271, § 7A . Only three bazaars per organization can be held
in a given calendar year, and these bazaars are limited to only five consecutive
hours per instance. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 7A .
Charitable organizations are also allowed to conduct, promote, and give
out prizes for the card game known as bridge, as long as the admission charges
for these games go solely to a charitable purpose. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271,
§ 22A .
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 22B also authorizes certain organizations
to conduct beano games, where lottery tickets can be sold, if these organizations
get a license from the director of the state lottery. These organizations
include:
Any fraternal organization having chapters or branches in at least one
other New England state, or any corporation organized under the provisions
of chapter 180, any religious organization under the control of or affiliated
with an established church of the commonwealth and any veterans' organization
incorporated or chartered by the Congress of the United States or listed
in clause (12) of section 5 of chapter 40, any volunteer, non-profit fire
company or similar organization furnishing public fire protection, any voluntary
association for promotion of the interests of retarded children, the Boston
Firemen's Relief Fund, any volunteer, non-profit organization furnishing
a public ambulance service, and non-profit athletic associations . . . .
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38 . An organization can only hold two beano
games per calendar week, provided one game is limited between the hours
of 6:00 pm and 12:00 midnight, and the other is limited to the hours of
1:00 pm until 6:00 pm.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38.
Prize values for a beano game are limited to one hundred dollars in value,
subject to a number of exceptions. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38 . These
exceptions include:
A) bonus cards, which can increase the prize in direct relation
to the cost of the cards, provided that it doesn’t increase the prize
more than one hundred percent. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38.
B) Special games, which cannot exceed five hundred dollars in cash or merchandise
for prizes. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38 .
C) two winner-take-all games per day, limited to five hundred dollars in
cash or merchandise for prizes. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38 .
D) four 50-50 games, limited to a prize not exceeding $1,200. Mass. Ann.
Laws ch. 10, § 38 .
E) two progressive jackpot games, where the total accumulated prize is limited
to three thousand dollars. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 38 .
It also seems that these charitable organizations that can conduct beano
games are allowed to operate the game of Keno as well. Mass. Ann. Laws ch.
10, § 27A .
Also, no person other than a fraternal, veterans’, or charitable
organization can be licensed as an agent to sell lottery tickets or shares
if such person engages in business exclusively as a lottery sales agent.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 27 .
3. Chucky Cheese exception
There is no statute governing family entertainment centers in Massachusetts,
but Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 140, § 177A , provides for the licensing of
automatic amusement machines. However, as stated in previous sections, the
only “prize” that seems to be allowed to be offered is free
plays or games, not coins or tickets that can be redeemed for a small piece
of merchandise.
4. Slot Machines/Commercial gambling
There is no commercial gambling allowed in Massachusetts. In fact, a slot
machine is specifically considered a gambling device. Mass. Ann. Laws ch.
271, § 5A . There is no exception for charitable organizations or even
horse tracks to set up and operate slot machines.
5. Lottery
Massachusetts has a state lottery commission that oversees the state lottery
activity in the state. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 23 . It is vested
with the power to conduct a state lottery and determine what type of lotteries
to run, what prizes to award, the manner of selecting and paying the winners,
the licensing of agents to sell the tickets, etc. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10,
§ 24 . The commission cannot license a person to be an agent if they
intend to be in business for the sole purpose of selling these tickets,
unless the person is a fraternal, veterans,’ or charitable organization.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 27 .
One of these games the commission is authorized to implement is Keno, provided
this game is run in coordination with or exclusively by charitable gaming
licensees. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 27A .
An interesting power of this state lottery commission is that if an individual
that owes child support wins over six hundred dollars in the state lottery,
the commission can disburse money to the appropriate agency to satisfy this
debt. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 28A .
Perhaps out of fear of collusion, no spouse, child, sibling, or parent
residing as a member of the same household of a commission member or employee
is eligible to win a prize through the state lottery. Mass. Ann. Laws ch.
10, § 31 .
Massachusetts has also given itself the possibility of joining into an
agreement with one or more states to set up a multi-jurisdictional lottery
game. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 10, § 24A .
6. Horseracing/Dog Racing
Massachusetts has a state racing commission that is in charge of approving
applications for individuals wishing to conduct racing meetings. Mass. Ann.
Laws ch. 128A, § 2 . This commission is also in charge of licensing
vets, blacksmiths, owners, trainers, jockeys and stable employees at these
tracks. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 9A . If the racing meet is run
in connection with a state or county fair, then the person wishing to hold
the race must bring forth a certificate from the commissioner of food and
agriculture that states:
1) such fair is a state or county fair as defined in section one, (2)
such fair has been operating for each of the five consecutive years immediately
preceding the date of filing such application and had received for each
of said five consecutive years assistance from the agricultural purposes
fund, (3) such fair is properly qualified as hereinafter in this paragraph
provided and (4) the location where such racing meeting is to be held
is annually approved by him and by the board of agriculture; and provided,
further, that on an application for a license to conduct a horse or dog
racing meeting in connection with a state or county fair by an applicant
to whom a prior license to conduct such a racing meeting at the race track
specified in said application has been granted by the commission, no hearing
need be held, unless a request, signed by at least one per cent of the
registered voters of the city or town in which the track is located, is
filed with the commission not later than thirty days following the granting
of said license.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 3 . Before these licenses can be granted,
a majority of the registered voters of that county must vote to allow pari-mutuel
betting on these races. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 14 .
No license shall be issued for more than two hundred aggregate days of
horse racing meetings in a single calendar year. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A,
§ 3(a) . However, up to two hundred days can be awarded in Suffolk
county only. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 3(a) . Except for races at
a state or county fair, there cannot be more than one horse race held during
the same time of the day at more than one racetrack, unless the tracks are
more than seventy-five miles apart. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 3(e)
.
The same aggregate two hundred day limit applies to harness horseracing
meetings. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 3(b). However, up to two hundred
days may be awarded in Norfolk County only. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, §
3(b) . Except for races at a state or county fair, there cannot be more
than one harness horse race held during the same time of the day at more
than one race track, unless the tracks are more than seventy-five miles
apart. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 3(f) .
Also, no license shall be issued for more than 1,190 aggregate days of
dog racing meets, excluding meetings held by a state or county fair in Essex
County. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 3(c) . No license can be issued
to permit dog-racing meetings to be conducted, except those at a state or
county fair, at the same time at more than one racetrack within the same
county or within twenty-five miles of another track. Mass. Ann. Laws ch.
128A, § 3(j) . Also, there cannot be dog racing at the same time at
more than four racetracks within the state. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, §
3(j) .
These racing licensees are required to set up a pari-mutuel or certificate
system of wagering at their facilities before they can conduct a racing
meet. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 5(a) . Automatic betting machines
capable of determining awards or dividends must be used at these locations.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 5(a) . This system of betting is limited
just to licensed tracks. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128A, § 5(b) . There seems
to be no provision in Massachusetts that allows for off-track betting facilities.
Massachusetts also permits a racing meeting licensee, except one operating
in Berkshire County, to simulcast live races within the commonwealth, except
in Berkshire county, and to other pari-mutuel licensees or other licensed
wagering facilities located outside the state. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128C,
§ 2 . All wagers on simulcast races accepted by a racing meeting licensee
within the state or by a licensee in another jurisdiction operating as a
guest track are included in the pari-mutuel pool of the licensee that conducts
the live race. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 128C, § 3.
VII. Specific Internet Prohibition
No specific law governing Internet gambling is found in Massachusetts.
VIII. Penalties
1. Gaming Offenses
Gaming or betting; forfeiture
A person convicted of winning money or goods exceeding five dollars by
betting on the sides or hands of those gaming, shall forfeit double the
value of the money or goods if a prosecution is commenced within eighteen
months after the commission of the crime. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, §
1 . Obviously, this applies to those that are making the bets or wagers.
Gaming or betting in public conveyance or place or while trespassing
in private place; arrest without warrant
According to Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 2 , a person playing cards,
dice, or any other game for money or property, or bets on the sides or hands
of those playing at a public place or a private place where he is trespassing,
is subject to a fine of up to fifty dollars or a prison term up to three
months. This part of the statute only applies to the players of these games.
However, the statute goes on to state that those that permit or set up these
games are subject to a fine up to one hundred dollars or a prison term between
three and twelve months. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 2 . This part of
the statute applies to the operators of these games only.
Innholders and others keeping or suffering implements to be used
for gaming/Gaming in Inns and other occupied places; use of billiard table,
bowling alley or other implement for gaming
Inn holders, or a person that keeps at any place occupied by him gambling
implements that are actually used for gaming for money or other property
is subject to an one hundred dollar fine or a prison term up to three months
long for the first offense. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 3 . Each later
offense is punishable by up to one year in prison. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271,
§ 3 . This statute only applies to keep those that keep these areas
and gambling implements, and not those that use it for gaming or engage
in gaming at these premises. However, Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 4
, provides a penalty for those that game for money or property at those
locations, or that use a billiard table, bowling alley, or other implement
of gaming for gaming purposes at these premises. These individuals can be
fined up to fifty dollars. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 4 .
Gaming, lottery, pool or betting houses; tables or apparatus for
gaming
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 5 is a statute that applies both to operators
and players. It states that an individual that keeps or assists in keeping
a common gaming structure, or is found playing or present at one of these
locations, can be fined up to fifty dollars or be imprisoned for up to three
months. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 5 .
Gambling devices; forfeiture; antique slot machines
It is illegal in Massachusetts to manufacture, transport, sell, store,
display, repair, recondition, possess or use a gambling device. Mass. Ann.
Laws ch. 271, § 5A . Because this includes using a gambling device,
this statute applies equally to operators, manufacturer, and players. Individuals
found guilty of this statute can be fined up to five thousand dollars. Mass.
Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 5A .
Gaming relative to cattle shows, military muster or public gathering;
arrest without warrant
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 6 provides that if one practices or engages
in gambling within one mile and during or within twelve hours of a cattle
show, military muster, or public gathering, then they must forfeit not more
than twenty dollars. If found in the act of gambling, they can be arrested
for not more than twenty-four hours until a complaint is lodged against
him. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 6 . The language used here seems to
apply equally to both operators and players.
Lotteries; disposal of property by chance
Those that set up or promote a lottery for money or property in Massachusetts
are subject to a fine up to three thousand dollars or a prison term of up
to three years. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 7 . Those that set up or
promote a skill of game or that set up or promote a “pyramid scheme”
are considered to be in violation of this lottery section. Mass. Ann. Laws
chi. 271, §§ 6A-6B . Because there is no mention of those that
just merely participate in these lotteries, this provision only applies
to the operators of these games.
Permitting lotteries, raffles and games of chance in buildings
Individuals that knowingly permit the setting up of a lottery at a structure
owned or occupied by them can be fined up to two thousand dollars or can
be sent to prison for up to one year. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 8
. Because of the broad lottery definition, those that knowingly suffer money
or other property to be given out via a raffle or a dice game or other game
of chance are subject to punishment under this statute. Mass. Ann. Laws
ch. 271, § 8 . This statute seemingly only applies to those that keep
the structures, not those that frequent it for gaming purposes.
Organizing or promoting gambling facilities or services/Place for
registering bets or dealing in pools; owner or occupant custodian or depository
Whoever organizes, supervises, manages, or finances at least four persons
that will conduct illegal lotteries, illegal bookmaking, etc. and receives
compensation from these individuals as a return from these lotteries, is
subject to a fine up to fifteen thousand dollars or a prison term up to
fifteen years. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 16A . This statute applies
only to the person supervising, not the individuals that the person is supervising.
However, those that keep a place used for bookmaking or pool-selling purposes
are subject to a fine up to three thousand dollars or a prison sentence
not exceeding three years. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 17 . Mass Ann.
Laws ch. 271, § 17 also punishes those that are found at such a location,
which could punish individuals that do not keep the building but frequent
it to place bets or wagers.
Telephones; use for gaming purposes
A individual that uses a telephone, knowingly permits another to use their
telephone, or falsely procures telephone service to engage in accepting
wagers or bets, or buying or selling of pools upon the results of an athletic
game or contest, a horse or dog race, or a lottery numbers game, can be
fined up to two thousand dollars or be put in prison for a year. Mass. Ann.
Laws ch. 271, § 17A .
Policy lotteries or shops; production, sale or possession of lottery
tickets or tokens
Whoever keeps, sets up, promotes or is concerned in an ownership capacity
in managing a policy lottery or policy shop, or writes, prints, sells, transfers
or delivers a lottery ticket-like device for money or any other thing of
value, can be fined up to five hundred dollars or be imprisoned for up to
one year. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 18 . From this language, it is
easy to conclude that this statute only applies to those that keep the shops
not those that frequent it for gaming purposes.
Delivery to or from a person engaged in a lottery or other gaming
Anyone that receives mail from a person having reasonable cause to believe
that the mail is related to some form of gaming, and the letter actually
does concern some form of gaming, can be fined between fifty and five hundred
dollars. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 22 .
Bucketing contracts; keeper of shop; domestic and foreign corporations
Anyone that keeps a bucket shop or makes or tries to make a contract of
bucketing can be fined up to one thousand dollars or be imprisoned for up
to one year for the first offense. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 36 .
If there is a second offense, a prison term of up to five years may be levied.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 36 .
Gifts to influence action of participants in, and others connected
with, a game or contest
Anyone that tries to use gifts to influence the participants within a game
or contest can be fined up to one thousand dollars or be imprisoned up to
two years, or both. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 39A .
Boxing matches or exhibitions; betting or selling pools
Also, those that bet, wager, or sell pools on the result of a boxing match
can be fined up to fifty dollars and be imprisoned for up to three months.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 42 .
2. Lottery Tickets offenses
Lottery ticket; advertising
Whoever sells, has intent to sell, or assists in selling a unauthorized
lottery ticket or other related writing, is subject to a fine of two thousand
dollars or a prison term up to one year. Mass Ann. Laws ch. 271, §
9 . Those that advertise a lottery ticket for sale can be subject to the
same penalties. Mass Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 11 .
False lottery tickets; creation, sale, or possession
Whoever makes or sells, or has in his possession with intent to sell a
false lottery ticket and who knows it to be false or receives money or other
thing of value for such ticket can be imprisoned for up to three years.
Mass Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 12 .
Lottery for money drawn out of commonwealth; aiding or promoting/tickets
of lottery described in section 15; sale or possession
A person found guilty of aiding, setting up, or promoting a lottery for
money drawn out of the commonwealth without authorization, is subject to
a monetary penalty up to two thousand dollars or imprisonment for up to
one year. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 15 . Those that sell, have the
intent to sell, or assist another in selling lottery tickets for money drawn
out of the commonwealth are subject to a two thousand dollar fine or imprisonment
for up to a year. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 16 .
3. Horse racing offenses
Racing horses for bet or stakes
Whoever engages in racing for betting or wagering purposes that are not
licensed by the state racing commission can be fined up to one thousand
dollars or be imprisoned for up to one year. Mass Ann. Laws ch. 271, §
31. Furthermore, those that keep or own an unauthorized race ground or trotting
park can be fined up to one thousand dollars or imprisoned up to one year.
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 34 .
Racing results or information; transmission for unlawful purposes
Anyone that supplies information about the results of a race or a race
in progress knowing that this information will be used for unlawful gambling
purposes can suffer a fine of up to five thousand dollars or be imprisoned
for up to five years, or be placed in a house or correction up to two and
a half years. Mass Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 31A . However, newspapers,
television stations, and radio stations can still report the result of races.
Mass Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 31A .
Horseracing; fraud
Anyone that that enters a disguised horse into a race or is a different
horse than the one that purports to be entered, or enters a horse into a
class in which it does not belong, can be fined up to five hundred dollars
or be imprisoned for up to six months. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 271, § 32.
IX. Statute of Anne/ Recovery of Debts
Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 137, § 1 states that
Whoever, by playing at cards, dice or other game, or by betting on the
sides or hands of those gaming, loses to a person so playing or betting
money or goods, and pays or delivers the same or any part thereof to the
winner, or whoever pays or delivers money or other thing of value to another
person for or in consideration of a lottery, policy or pool ticket, certificate,
check or slip, or for or in consideration of a chance of drawing or obtaining
any money, prize or other thing of value in a lottery or policy game,
pool or combination, or other bet, may recover such money or the value
of such goods in contract; and if he does not within three months after
such loss, payment or delivery, without covin or collusion, prosecute
such action with effect, any other person may sue for and recover in tort
treble the value thereof.
This statute is odd in the fact that if the loser fails within three months
to bring this action to recover his money, any person can bring this cause
of action to recover the treble value of the losses within a year’s
time. Donovan v. Eastern Racing Ass’n, 86 N.E.2d 903, 904-05
(Mass. 1949).
It seems that individuals can even recover this loss from the stakeholder
of an illegal wager if they demand the money from the stakeholder before
it is paid over to the winner. Morgan v. Beaumont, 121 Mass. 7, 7
(Mass. 1876).
|